Trolls Film Online 2016 FreeAre Right- Wing Libertarian Internet Trolls Getting Paid to Dumb Down Online Conversations? They are the online equivalent of enclosure riots: the rick- burning, fence- toppling protests by English peasants losing their rights to the land. When Master. Card, Visa, Paypal and Amazon tried to shut Wiki. Leaks out of the cyber- commons, an army of hackers responded by trying to smash their way into these great estates and pull down their fences. In the Wikileaks punch- up the commoners appear to have the upper hand. But it’s just one battle. There’s a wider cyberwar being fought, of which you hear much less. And in most cases the landlords, with the help of a mercenary army, are winning. Trolls Film Online 2016 RusskieIn einer kunterbunten Welt leben die This holiday season, enter a colorful, wondrous world populated by hilariously unforgettable characters and discover the story of the overly optimistic Trolls, with a. With Anna Kendrick, Zooey Deschanel, Justin Timberlake, Christine Baranski. A troll princess and her companion, the one unhappy troll try to rescue her friends from. Silicon Valley engineer Bindu Reddy created the new social network Candid that facilitates online conversations without trolls. Canadian researchers have confirmed what most people suspected all along: that internet trolls are archetypal Machiavellian sadists. From the creators of Shrek comes DreamWorks Animation's Trolls, a smart, funny and irreverent comedy about the search for happiness, and just how far some will go to. See the latest films, listings, times, IMAX,3D, 2D film releases at ODEON. Browse cinema listings, book tickets. What Fuels Trump-Supporting Twitter Trolls? Examining the identity politics that drive Trump backers to harrass Jewish writers online. I’m not talking here about threats to net neutrality and the danger of a two- tier internet developing, though these are real. I’m talking about the daily attempts to control and influence content in the interests of the state and corporations: attempts in which money talks. The weapon used by both state and corporate players is a technique known as astroturfing. An astroturf campaign is one that mimics spontaneous grassroots mobilizations, but which has in reality been organized. Anyone writing a comment piece in Mandarin critical of the Chinese government, for example, is likely to be bombarded with abuse by people purporting to be ordinary citizens, upset by the slurs against their country. But many of them aren’t upset: they are members of the 5. Cent Party, so- called because one Chinese government agency pays 5 mao (half a yuan) for every post its tame commenters write. Teams of these sock- puppets are hired by party leaders to drown out critical voices and derail intelligent debates. I first came across online astroturfing in 2. Andy Rowell and Jonathan Matthews looked into a series of comments made by two people calling themselves Mary Murphy and Andura Smetacek. They had launched ferocious attacks, across several internet forums, against a scientist whose research suggested that Mexican corn had been widely contaminated by GM pollen. Rowell and Matthews found that one of the messages Mary Murphy had sent came from a domain owned by the Bivings Group, a PR company specializing in internet lobbying. An article on the Bivings website explained that “there are some campaigns where it would be undesirable or even disastrous to let the audience know that your organization is directly involved . Once you are plugged into this world, it is possible to make postings to these outlets that present your position as an uninvolved third party. When a Bivings executive was challenged by Newsnight, he admitted that the “Mary Murphy” email was sent by someone “working for Bivings” or “clients using our services”. Rowell and Matthews then discovered that the IP address on Andura Smetacek’s messages was assigned to Monsanto’s headquarters in St. There’s a nice twist to this story. Astro. Turf TM - real fake grass - was developed and patented by Monsanto. Reading comment threads on the Guardian’s sites and elsewhere on the web, two patterns jump out at me. The first is that discussions of issues in which there’s little money at stake tend to be a lot more civilized than debates about issues where companies stand to lose or gain billions: such as climate change, public health and corporate tax avoidance. These are often characterized by amazing levels of abuse and disruption. Articles about the environment are hit harder by such tactics than any others. I love debate, and I often wade into the threads beneath my columns. But it’s a depressing experience, as instead of contesting the issues I raise, many of those who disagree bombard me with infantile abuse, or just keep repeating a fiction, however often you discredit it. Both traditional conservatives and traditional progressives tend be more willing to discuss an issue than these right- wing libertarians, many of whom seek instead to shut down debate. So what’s going on? I’m not suggesting that most of the people trying to derail these discussions are paid to do so, though I would be surprised if none were. I’m suggesting that some of the efforts to prevent intelligence from blooming seem to be organized, and that neither website hosts nor other commenters know how to respond. For his film (Astro)Turf Wars, Taki Oldham secretly recorded a training session organized by a rightwing libertarian group called American Majority. The trainer, Austin James, was instructing Tea Party members on how to “manipulate the medium”. This is what he told them: “Here’s what I do. I get on Amazon; I type in “Liberal Books”. I go through and I say “one star, one star, one star”. The flipside is you go to a conservative/ libertarian whatever, go to their products and give them five stars. These are places where you can rate movies. So when you type in “Movies on Healthcare”, I don’t want Michael Moore’s to come up, so I always give it bad ratings. I spend about 3. 0 minutes a day, just click, click, click, click. That’s how you control the online dialogue and give our ideas a fighting chance.”Over 7. American Majority, which hosted this training session, comes from the Sam Adams Alliance. In 2. 00. 8, the year in which American Majority was founded, 8. A group which trains rightwing libertarians to distort online democratic processes, in other words, was set up with funding from a person or company with a very large wallet. The internet is a remarkable gift, which has granted us one of the greatest democratic opportunities since universal suffrage. We’re in danger of losing this global commons as it comes under assault from an army of trolls and flacks, many of them covertly organised or trained. It’s time we fought back and reclaimed the internet for what it does best: exploring issues, testing ideas, opening the debate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |